I don't know enough about the specifics of German Unification to say whether it would be fun though. i'd really support ACW, German unification, Africa etc.Īfrica would just be part of the Grand Campaign though, I do not think it needs to be a Mini-Campaign. Yes that's what i've ment with "mini campaigns" a few postes above. I don't think we will see a standalone American Civl War TW, however if Victorian Total War does end up being a thing( yes please!) I could see the ACW being a Campaign pack for like 15 bucks.Īlso OP, you seem to have placed this in the wrong forum section by the way. Because WW1 was a complete bombarding camping fest and the following charge was usually massacred by machine gunsĪlso the whole battalion system of TW would need an overhaul i guess. So If CA does make a WW1 game it would have to be very different from what we know. Because WW1 was a complete bombarding camping fest and the following charge was usually massacred by machine guns So If CA does make a WW1 game it would have to be very different from what we know it was. I think normal rifles was about 2-3% or something of total casualties, at least in europe. Casualties in WW1 came from roughly 75% artillery, about 15% was machineguns. If the game is even close to be realistic, WW1 gameplay doesn't sound fun in my opinion. Mongols could be one or Victorian/imperial/WW1 is my speculation but maybe China or something else could happen, we have no idea.Ī Total war WW1 game would have to be very different from real life in order to be fun to play.
Looks promising since the first was good. On the other hand that Darthmodder guy is making a sequel to his first Civil War game. But it might be a bit to small for many people in terms of units, sides etc. But Civil War of USA is not something they wont do. They have said it will be a period they havent done before. i just remembered more of the "bigger" conflicts of that time that includes the bigger nations (Austria, Prussia/The Reich, France, US, Britain, Russia) There is really a lot of small, contained conflict that would work well as a mini campaign. German unification (German-Danish war, Austro-Prussian war, Franco-Prussian war) You could squeeze in native americans and european expeditionary forces, but beyond that? Would work way better as a mini-campaign for a victorian age TW.
The main problem is the extremely limited number of factions. A game for a war and time period many find extremely interesting. To me this is something that would work out great. Is there anyone else out there like me who would like a total war game for the time period of the American Civil War? Something along the lines of 1860-1890. PS: Whoever flagged you that I poked fun at was right, this isn't the right forum for wish-listing future TW stuff outside of the WH series. Would it have enough players though? I'm not a civil war expert, but as far as I know it's basically just two sides? With some very limited external involvement that probably wouldn't justify including factions? I'm not sure a 2-side game would make a good TW.) So yeah, I'm actually not too opposed to your civil war idea. I'd be glad to be proven wrong if they insist on going down that path. CA could always prove me wrong though, I guess. I'm interested in both of those, but don't feel they'd work well for TW. I do rather hope they don't try and take it in the direction of WW1 or 2.
And I'm sure I'll get it one day, with patience. I'm honestly not sure what I want them to do next for a historical TW that /doesn't/ involve a sequal they refuse to create - for the moment, at least. but I'd probably buy it and have some fun. It could certainly work, it wouldn't be all the different from napoleon/empire/FoTS. (You're not the first person to think of a civil war type deal though. Thanks, I hadn't quite had enough turkey last night, and this really tops me off. I feed off the tears of the people who get so worked up they have to flag these posts immediately.
0 kommentar(er)
